ART Predictions

Testable Hypotheses and Experimental Evidence

A true Theory of Everything must make testable predictions. Arche Resonance Theory is not merely philosophical speculation but a rigorous mathematical framework that generates specific, falsifiable hypotheses about the physical world. Here we explore ART's key predictions and how they fare against experimental evidence. In practice, this page is about what ART says we should actually be able to measure—in experiments, observations, and data—and how those measurements could confirm or refute it.

What Makes a Prediction Testable?

A testable prediction must be: (1) specific enough to be falsified, (2) derived from first principles rather than fitted to data, (3) capable of being verified through experiment or observation, and (4) preferably novel—predicting something not yet known. ART's predictions meet these criteria.

Physical Constants and Fundamental Parameters

ART derives the values of fundamental physical constants from the recursive structure of the Archeos and the geometry of the Frequency Domain. Rather than treating these as arbitrary givens, ART shows why they must have their particular values.

Fine Structure Constant (α)

ART predicts a specific value for the fine structure constant based on the harmonic structure of the Frequency Domain. This prediction can be compared to the experimentally measured value (α ≈ 1/137.036). Current experimental precision: ±0.000000011.

Electron-to-Proton Mass Ratio

ART derives the mass ratio between electrons and protons from the compossibility constraints on Archeonic expressions. This ratio (≈ 1/1836.15) is one of the most precisely measured quantities in physics and provides a stringent test of the framework.

Dark Matter and Dark Energy

ART provides novel explanations for two of cosmology's greatest mysteries:

Dark Matter as Projection Residual

ART proposes that dark matter is not a new particle but a manifestation of the strain in the Projection Manifold caused by the holomorphic projection from the Frequency Domain. This predicts specific spatial distributions and gravitational signatures that differ from particle-based dark matter models.

Dark Energy as Closure Gradient

ART identifies dark energy with the Closure Gradient—the universal drive toward recursive closure and self-consistency. This predicts that dark energy should increase as the universe evolves toward greater coherence, with specific predictions about the equation of state parameter w.

Quantum Mechanics and Gravity

ART makes predictions about the unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity:

  • Planck Scale Structure: ART predicts specific geometric properties of spacetime at the Planck scale, testable through gravitational wave observations and precision measurements of spacetime curvature.
  • Quantum Entanglement: ART predicts that entanglement is a manifestation of phase-locking in the Frequency Domain, with specific predictions about the strength and range of entanglement correlations.
  • Wave Function Collapse: ART provides a mechanism for wave function collapse based on the Closure Gradient, predicting specific deviations from standard quantum mechanics at certain scales.

Consciousness and Neuroscience

ART makes testable predictions about consciousness and brain function:

Phase-Locking and Consciousness

ART predicts that consciousness correlates with phase-locking across neural frequency bands. This predicts specific patterns of neural synchronization that should be observable in EEG, MEG, and fMRI data. Disruption of phase-locking should correlate with loss of consciousness.

Boundary Information and Perception

ART predicts that perception is determined by boundary information (edges, textures, rhythms). This predicts specific relationships between sensory input at the boundary and internal neural models, testable through psychophysical experiments and neural recording.

Current Status and Future Tests

ART's predictions are being refined and tested against existing experimental data. Some predictions align with current observations (e.g., the values of physical constants), while others await new experimental techniques or observations (e.g., specific signatures of dark matter distribution, neural phase-locking patterns in consciousness).

The framework is designed to be falsifiable: if experiments show that physical constants have different values than ART predicts, or that consciousness does not correlate with phase-locking, or that dark energy behaves differently than the Closure Gradient predicts, then ART would need to be revised or rejected.

← Back to GUT